Vitamin E Overdose Info
Is Vitamin
E overdose possible?
An interesting question considering some recently released
information stating that those taking Vitamin E supplements run the
risk of dying earlier than those who don't.
My opinion on this? While we admit we don't have a Ph.D in
biochemistry, we feel
such claims are utterly ridiculous and irresponsible.
Why do I think this?
Because the drug
business, in the United States at least, has enormous power and
they yield it routinely. In other words, anything that
can possibly interfere with their profits, they will seek to
discredit. This opinion has been formed over three decades of
observation.
I also have friends who are certified master herbalists who have
been persecuted for actually healing people of
diseases!
The study in question was published in early November 2004 by
researchers at John Hopkins University and was published in Annals
of Internal Medicine. In the study, they reviewed 19 specifically
different vitamin E studies from 1966 and 2004 to a meta-analysis.
Total number of subjects' ages ranged from 47 to 84, totaling
135,967.
Dosages of vitamin E
ranged from 16.5 to 2,000 IU (international units) per day.
Let's quote directly from the newsletter which incited this article
to give you the full flavor:
In other words this was not a 'physical' study in
its own right but rather a compilation of data from many studies
which are pre-selected by the researchers. They then take this data
and feed it into various 'meta-analysis' software and adjust the
information to eventually reach certain
conclusions.
The bottom
line... In this case the bottom line is that the
researchers suggest that too much of vitamin E (400 IU or more per
day) increases the risk of all-cause mortality.
Hmmm... interesting! BUT... are their conclusions
reliable ones? Who knows... what we do know however is that the
conclusions in these meta-analyses can be highly speculative
because of the different variables in each of the studies included
in the analyses. For example, what was the source of vitamin E, was
it natural or synthetic (the difference is significant), what was
the study duration, health/disease condition of subjects, etc.
Hence, the study doesn't provide definitive proof of anything, due
to the lack of uniform protocols and patient groups.
Nonetheless, In spite of the lack of
definitive proof, this study does tend to reinforce a principle
that we have long adhered to. What is this principle?
Very simply ... no single nutrient is the panacea for any
ailment. In fact a single nutrient can sometimes do more
harm that good.
Politics
This has been one of the fundamental faults of the
supplement industry since its early days. Rather than design products based on
science the industry has tended to bow to public demand for the
latest 'fad' nutrient. The public get to learn of a
specific nutrient that has certain beneficial properties and then
everyone wants it, and manufacturers then provide what the public
wants which is generally
based on the premise that more is better, so
consequently products come out with higher and higher doses of
individual nutrients.
Usually both manufacturers and
consumers alike are oblivious to the short and long term side
effects of taking some nutrients on their own. This in
turn contributes to the worldwide trend for authorities to limit
the doses of a number of supplement ingredients.
That in itself would
not be too serious but it has started a 'ball rolling' which has
other negative implications for both industry and consumers
alike. But, that is another story for another day.
Getting back to this Vitamin E Overdose web page,
professional
supplementation is the answer to good general health and
longevity.
Taking isolated nutrients in high doses is counter productive to
the objective. A classic example of taking high doses of a nutrient
on its own was the beta-carotene debacle in 1996.
Two studies (referred to as the ATBC and CARET studies) produced
evidence that taking beta-carotene alone may increase cancer risks
for smokers. The scientific explanation for this is that all the
carotenoids which beta-carotene is just one, work synergistically
as a team - recharging and supporting each other to confer the
health benefits.
In other words other carotenoids such as lutein etc have to be
present in order to duplicate nature as much as possible. But, of
course this was not explained to the public as scary headlines are
more attractive to the media in general.
Politics - Cont'd
A similar situation exists with Vitamin E and very likely explains
the conclusions of the researchers. The common Vitamin E used by
most people is only one fraction of Vitamin E. High does of Vitamin
E (alpha-tocopherol) alone has been shown to deplete the body's
gamma-tocopherol. Despite alpha tocopherol's action as an
antioxidant, gamma tocopherol is required to effectively remove the
harmful peroxynitrite-derived nitrating species.
While admittedly our linking of this study and other studies to
the drug companies is sketchy at best, it is no uncommon in the
hugely profitable health care industry to get marketing and
advertising shills to promote, disguise, and market a product or
company that has at its core a desire for gain above all -- even to
the exclusion of helping others' health.
A perfect example is the "Got Milk" campaign. Milk, while it
certainly has some positive aspects to it health wise, milk is one
of the worst things people can drink. The meat advertising campaign
as well does the same thing. Yes, meat certainly does have some
health benefits, but in our opinion, it does more harm than good.
(Do WE eat milk products or eat meat? Yes,
occasionally and very sparingly but certainly not at every
meal.)
Historically, cigarette companies sponsored
advertising campaigns to actually tout the benefits of cigarette
smoking by quoting studies that validated such a claim. But no more
-- once the public wised
up.
My Point:
Just remember, just because some organization, research study, or
doctor says something is good or bad for you shouldn't be canonized
as if he or she was Moses just down from the mount. If you've
explored other pages on this site, you'll know we speak highly of
research studies, doctors, and medical practitioners, even
recommending you consult with your doctor before beginning any kind
of supplementation program.
All I'm saying is use
your common sense, your mind, to look through the fog and to think
for yourself.
Final Word: It's not new that vitamin E should be
persecuted. As early as the late 1940s, two Canadian doctors, Evan
Shute and his brother Wilfrid were treating heart patients with
vitamin E at their clinic in London, Ontario. Moreover, both were
denounced by the North American medical community.
Hippie Movement?
In fact as late as the early 70s, vitamin E research was largely
ignored, until the "hippie movement brought it to the awareness of
the medical establishment. Since then, it's been widely researched
and discussed having found its way into accepted scientific
journals as a nutrient with many positive health benefits.
German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer was right, "Truth goes
through three states: First, it is ridiculed and mocked, secondly,
it's violently opposed, and then it's accepted as
self-evident." That was certainly the case with vitamin E.
Side Effects of Too Much Vitamin E
Vitamin E Side Effects Symptoms
Vitamin E Overdose... So, what are some of the side effects
of vitamin E? Or, what are issues or consequences of vitamin E
overdose? One doctor team has stated on their personal website that
"there are no cases of vitamin E overdose have been reported."
Vitamin E overdose is very, very, very rare, but any
nutrient taken to excess, however, can be harmful.
Excessive amounts of vitamin E could be characterized by nausea,
vomiting, sweats, etc. There are no known fatalities from taking
too much vitamin E. Personally, I take about 67 mgs of vitamin E
with the rest of it coming from our diet.
However, vitamin E side effects are as rare as an honest
politician. In truth, they are very uncommon and are almost not
reported at all. Very scanty evidence is available with such side
effects happening. For those who want the benefits of Vitamin E,
the U.S. government recommends that the RDA (Recommended Daily Allowance) is 8
mgs per day for adult women, 10 mgs daily for adult men.
However, if you want therapeutic benefits of Vitamin E, you'll need
to take more. I personally take a multivitamin supplement called that contains
vitamin E and over 70
other nutrients including a full spectrum of not only
vitamins but minerals, herbal extracts, trace minerals, enzymes,
and specialty nutrients.
It is pharmaceutical grade quality manufactured by a company in
New Zealand where dietary supplement manufacturing standards
actually surpass the US FDA's requirements for prescription
medication. Nutritionists as well as doctors recommend that
vitamins should be taken with other minerals and trace elements as
they are co-factors and interdependent biochemically.
Specifically, you
should make sure if you take a vitamin E supplement that you also
take it with Zinc as it needs Zinc to work properly. For
basic yet vital Vitamin E information, click on our core
Vitamin E informational web page in this
website. It is complementary to this Vitamin E Overdose
page.
I hope this Vitamin E Overdose web page has been useful
to you.
Yours in health, hope, and harmony,
Nutritional-Supplement-Bible.com
|